The same mechanisms that supposedly protect teeth also cause
tooth mottling.
It is quite the double-edged sword.
Reference:
"The Fluoride Question, Panacea or Poison?" Page 21 ~ By Anne-Lise
Gotzsche
FLUORIDATION TRIAL CONTROLS: ERRORS, OMISSIONS AND
MIS-STATEMENTS
Superior dental care in Brantford: The
United Kingdom Mission (1953) said:
“Brantford, however, over a period of 15 years, has provided more free dental services for children than most Canadian cities, and this has resulted in the ratio of corrected to total defects being higher than in either Sarnia or Stratford.”
It considered that in Brantford “dental care was outstandingly good.” Also, Brown, in 1952, said:
“Brantford, however, over a period of 15 years, has provided more free dental services for children than most Canadian cities, and this has resulted in the ratio of corrected to total defects being higher than in either Sarnia or Stratford.”
It considered that in Brantford “dental care was outstandingly good.” Also, Brown, in 1952, said:
“The recordings so far obtained indicate both a higher
treatment and an apparently better oral hygiene status of the Brantford
children when compared with the controls, and it is therefore suggested that
caution should be exercised in the interpretation of the rates shown. The lack
of a pre-fluoridation survey on a comparable basis is a further limiting factor
in interpreting the results.”
No comments:
Post a Comment